🧭 At a Glance:
The Mask – Why we assume that less conflict means more love
The Cost – How conflict avoidance erodes emotional safety
The Threshold – What science reveals about rupture and repair
The Mirror – What conscious couples practice when conflict arises
Why we assume that less conflict means more love
Most people think good relationships are easy.
That love should feel smooth. That tension means trouble.
So when conflict shows up — raised voices, hard pauses, misattunement — we panic.
“We’re not compatible.”
“This isn’t supposed to be this hard.”
“Something must be wrong.”
But the truth is, conflict is not the enemy of connection. Avoiding it is.
Esther Perel puts it simply:
“Conflict is the start of a conversation, not the end of one.”
In her conversation with Andrew Huberman (2024), Perel emphasizes that conflict is where relational identity is forged — not just eroded.
She notes that most couples don’t break up because of too much conflict.
They fracture from emotional distance — when the system can no longer tolerate difference, disagreement, or discomfort.
And that’s where the myth fails us.
The absence of conflict doesn’t signal harmony. It often signals silence.
How conflict avoidance erodes emotional safety
When couples fear conflict, they begin to fear each other’s truths.
So they trade honesty for harmony.
But harmony without honesty becomes tension in disguise.
Over time, conflict avoidance leads to:
Unspoken resentments
Emotional loneliness in the presence of closeness
Growing fear of “rocking the boat”
Identity suppression in the name of “peace”
John Gottman’s research (1993) shows that the most corrosive pattern in a relationship is not fighting — but avoiding necessary confrontation, especially when needs are unmet.
In Gottman’s “Distance and Isolation Cascade,” couples who suppress tension are more likely to experience:
Diminished emotional attunement
Loneliness within the relationship
Parallel lives rather than shared ones
The risk isn’t the argument.
The risk is the build-up of invisible pressure — until one partner disconnects entirely.
What science reveals about rupture and repair
In healthy relationships, conflict isn’t a breakdown. It’s a bid — for understanding.
But only when it’s done well.
Gottman’s famous “Four Horsemen” (criticism, contempt, defensiveness, and stonewalling) are reliable predictors of divorce.
But even they aren’t fatal — unless they go unrepaired.
According to Gottman’s longitudinal studies, what separates thriving couples from struggling ones is not fewer fights — but more effective repairs.
Repairs can be small but profound:
A deep breath before responding
A touch to the arm mid-argument
A willingness to say, “That came out wrong. Let me try again.”
In moments of tension, emotionally intelligent couples pause. They stay curious. They prioritize the relationship over being right.
As Perel reminds us:
“Every relationship straddles stability and change. Conflict becomes generative when both people feel free to express without fear of abandonment.”
Conflict, in that sense, is not the fire that burns a relationship down.
It’s the heat that forges trust — if both people can tolerate the flame.
What conscious couples practice when things get tense
Conscious couples don’t avoid conflict. They embrace it as part of intimacy.
But they do it with awareness.
Here’s what they tend to practice:
They name the pattern, not the person: Instead of “You always do this,” they reflect: “We fall into this loop — how do we want to change it?”
They use conflict to learn, not to win: Curiosity invites expansion. Reactivity contracts the system.
They see tension as information, not danger: When things get hard, they ask:
“What’s being triggered?”; “What does this moment need?”They co-author the repair: One apologizes. The other receives. And both commit to different moves next time.
They rewrite the story together: Conflict no longer becomes a sign of doom.
It becomes part of the narrative they’ve weathered — together.
As Gottman concludes in his studies:
“The issue is never whether couples fight — it’s whether they repair.”
The difference between disconnection and deepening isn’t the absence of tension. It’s the presence of return.
From “We fight too much” To “Can we get better at repairing?”
That’s what builds lasting connection. Not silence, not perfection.
But the courage to come back to each other after rupture.
Thanks for reading.
See you soon!
Team Rebuild
P.S. If you liked this newsletter, share it with your friends and colleagues Rebuild